![]() I did try to configure the Group Global loopback and it still did not show groups ![]() Why is this so mysterious on Juniper? I did searches on the internet and found articles on Group Global loopback configurations, and found people instructing to use a Proxy Arp. When I ping the Cisco lo0 address of 1.1.1.1 I have success. Just like between my switch and my juniper router these two are connected directly from the switch to the router on a direct link. If you notice in my static config above, I have a route to 1.1.1.1 via 10.40.1.1. I have had no problem setting up multiple Cisco routers with a lo0 address and pinging from my Juniper switch. I set up a static route on my switch to point to next-hop of 10.20.1.3 so the switch would know to go to that address to get to 7.7.7.7. I am able to ping from router to switch using the driectly connected address I am able to ping from switch to router using the directly connected address ON a EX2200-C switch that is connected to this router the following way: I am able to ping this address from the router itself #run ping 7.7.7.7 successful I am trying to set up a J2350 router with a lo0 interface address 7.7.7.7. AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THIS POST I PUT THE OUTPUT OF THE LOOPBACK ON R8.ītw: came up with a nice command: show interfaces | match "0*|address" :: just shows ge and lo interface names and associated addresses. MAYBE it has something to do with what unit (logical subinterface) I am putting the loopback's address ON? I am using unit 0. MY CONCLUSION, something (aside from opening up complete TRUST zone of all services and all protocols on both routers) is keeping both routers from responding to PINGs to their LOOPBACK interface. ![]() but IĬAN'T ping from the switch to the loopback of either router, or from either router to the loopback of the other router. Does anyone out there have experience setting up loopback addresses on routers and being able to ping from other devices in the configured senario? These are all physical devices that I have.ĬAN ping from each router to the loopback of the switch (without even a static route in either router pointing to the loopback's next hop from the router to the switch). I need to get back to my studying and this is taking a very long time. I am at a point in my studying where I need to be able to ping loopback interfaces on different routers. Below I have several updates, things I have tried.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |